Legal Junkies Forums

#1 Community for Pre-Law and Law Students (Beta)

 

Changing the Law School Ranking Formula

This is a discussion on Changing the Law School Ranking Formula within the Law School Rankings forum, part of the Deciding Where to Go category; More ideas have come in on ways to improve the U.S. News law schools rankings . U.S. News is seriously ...


Go Back   Legal Junkies Forums > Deciding Where to Go > Law School Rankings

Register FAQ Tags Members List Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Layout



Reply

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-25-2009, 08:18 PM
News
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 113
Default Changing the Law School Ranking Formula

More ideas have come in on ways to improve the U.S. News law schools rankings. U.S. News is seriously studying these two ideas for implementation in the upcoming rankings. Please weigh in with your views.

The first idea is that U.S. News should count both full-time and part-time entering student admission data for median LSAT scores and median undergraduate grade-point averages in calculating the school's ranking. U.S. News's current law school ranking methodology counts only full-time entering student data. Many people have told us that some law schools operate part-time J.D. programs for the purpose of enrolling students who have far lower LSAT and undergrad GPAs than the students admitted to the full-time program in order to boost their admission data reported to U.S. News and the ABA. In other words, many contend that these aren't truly separate part-time programs but merely a vehicle to raise a law school's LSAT and undergrad GPA for its U.S. News ranking. We have used only full-time program data because we believed that the part-time law programs were truly separate from the full-time ones. That no longer appears to be the case at many law schools. So, it can be argued that it is better analytically to compare the LSAT and undergrad GPAs of the entire entering class at all schools rather than just the full-time program data.

Another idea was proposed in the 1998 report "The Validity of the U.S. News and World Report Rankings of ABA Law Schools" commissioned by the Association of American Law Schools. The proposal calls for U.S. News to compute our bar passage rate component (school's bar pass rate/jurisdiction's bar passage rate) using only the data of first-time takers who are graduates of American Bar Association-accredited schools. Currently, our "jurisdiction's bar passage rate" uses the rate of all first-time test takers from a state regardless of the ABA accreditation of their law schools. This distinction is perhaps most meaningful for the state of California, which has a large number of non-ABA-accredited schools. Many people say the non-ABA students are causing the California pass rate to be lower than if calculated just from first-time test takers from ABA-accredited schools. Because we rank only ABA-accredited schools, it makes sense that we should compare only ABA graduates when doing the bar passage rate analysis. If U.S. News implements this idea, the method would be used for all states.





More...
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
Reply

Bookmarks




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gov. Granholm signs bills changing Michigan schools law forum_admin Anything Law Related 0 01-04-2010 03:16 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 PM.


Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer. Copyright 2000-2012 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.